Hi guys…to the people, who don’t know me, let me introduce myself. My name is Shivaram and I was a classmate of Anand, CK and Raghu back in school.
Let me start. Since Anand brought up the subject, “sense of belonging” and there is a big controversy on caste reservation going back in India right now, I thought this would be a good time to post my first blog. I had a chat with CK a few weeks ago on the issue of casteism and he sounded really pissed off with the so called “stupid” idea. He was questioning me on its purpose but I couldn’t give him a convincing answer. All I know was that something was not right and we were both losing the bigger picture. He was also convinced that a developed India is not possible unless it is eliminated. I am sure that most of the educated Indians here in the US and back in India would agree on that. I agree on it too but are we missing a point here…let me explain my thoughts a little bit…
Anand in your post the point you make is, let me quote your own words.... “One feels happy to see people from same planet in another planet.. people from same country in another country.. people from the same state in another state.. people from the same city in another city.. Now where does this sense of belonging come from? If we think at the level of planet now itself… then in that case will not the problems related to territory/language cease?” The irony Anand, the converse of this idea is the basic root for casteism….it is this SAME narrow-minded sense of belonging that is responsible for segregating groups of people all over the world, including India. So, where does this sense of belonging originate from? It takes its root from an inherent tendency of the human mind. Everything arises from the mind and this idea of segregation or dividing is no exception. The human mind tends to group similar things together to better understand and assimilate it. You name it, we group people in the name of religion or way of life (Christians, Muslims, Hindus,…), colour (black, white, yellow, wheatish brown..), governments based on political regimes (communist, democratic, totalitarianism…), profession (engineers, doctors, teachers…) and a little further…for example, you can subdivide engineers (CSE, ECE, EE, ME, CHE..)….etc, you can keep on subdividing it and group it further and further based on some common qualities all the way to the end. A paleontologist can help us understand this concept a little better. While this human faculty endures on, there are other qualities of the human mind that come into play such as ego, anger, hate, dominance, etc… that tag along and it is here that we begin to discriminate people between these segregated groups. As time grows, the groups begin to overlap and the lines of distinction become blurry making it only worse as we completely lose all laws of rationality ending up pointing fingers at everyone.
So what then, can we eliminate casteism or anything similar in lines to it? Is it a boon or a bane? These questions arise in our minds almost instantaneously. If you ponder about it, you will only end up going around in circles. No wonder it has been a subject of debate for decades. However, in my opinion the answer is simple, you cannot eliminate casteism. Why? As long as the human mind takes up the policy of “divide and rule” or should I say “divide and assimilate” there is no way of getting rid of casteism in India or anywhere in the world (rascism). It is neither a boon nor a bane, it a just a FACT waiting to be accepted and no amount of logic, reasoning and demands of rationality is going to eliminate it. It has been there from time immemorial (refer last chapter in the Bhagavad Gita) and will be there till the end of time or at least I would say till the end of human existence. All we can do on our part is we can strive to attain oneness and practice equality among the existing groups in this world. But I guess that would be an impossible task. Hence, I would say that all the “isms” are here to stay whether you accept it or not. If you are still not convinced and you believe you can eliminate it, then let me give you a small test. Try naming your children with a single name (the idea here is to eliminate discrimination, i.e. treating them as equals ) and if you are successful in calling out the right child every time you shout the name, then you might have a solution. But on the other hand, if you extrapolate this method to higher levels (city, state, country), then you might end up having groups of people segregated based on their different names…hmm….guess then we would all end up with the same problem here too.
Friday, June 16, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
When i say i want to eliminate the caste system, i want to totally get rid of the system in its current form.
I am not sayin i want to turn a blind eye to the differences that exists among us; infact its the diversity (of thought and appearance) that makes life so interesting. But my point is, if Galileo (or is it copernicus) can disprove geo-centric universe and bring in the helio-centric solar system; or if we can drop socialism for capitalism since it did not work; or we can accept evolution instead what is said in the scriptures; or we update and cross check everything that has been said, why hold on to this idea which has long since become defunct and absolutely worthless in modern society(maybe in those days of yore when life was simple it worked to classify the society). And, oh yes! please do not quote Bhagavad Gita to even justify it. I have great reverence for the Gita, but i am not ready to believe that its unquestionable (its a manmade work and so it ain't perfect). What do you guys think when people go to court in the US to question evolution because Bible says something else?
What frustrates me to the core is why people hold on to this idea to be so sacrosanct that there cannot be any revision (if we can be so dogmatic in our views, why do we jump at the first instance to point fingers at others readily). I am absolutely amused when people try to justify castes by saying how it worked to classify our society a few millenia ago or that it was based on profession. I find it quite intriguing to be told that i am so and so (caste) because my GREAT GREAT......GREAT grandfather with all his wisdom chose to do a particular job. Or if we take the other theory people put forth that it was based on the qualities a person possessed (i guess they use the word tamasic here, though i am not sure), but i have a problem here too. Why classify me as someone for whatever qualities some relative of mine had a few hundred generations ago? I don't get it, but i have not found one convincing answer to hold on to this idea which has only scarred our society.
C Karthikeyan
Again forgive me if i sound blasphemous, but Gita is not the beginning of mankind(i get ur point though ;) )....
As for US in Iraq, thats a big story in itself, so lemme nt get into it. (and plz peel the onion and see thru the propaganda). I have not been trying to preach, but merely tried to put forth a point that we should have an open mind, not a few nods for the ill-effects the caste system has produced....
And BTW, the Reservation issue is too big to write in a comment, so will post my thoughts soon.
C K
you can add Captain Vijaykanth also in that list....
Post a Comment